لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
In accordance with the EPA cost schedule, the request should be limited in scope, and never be supposed for redistribution around the internet or for commercial purposes.
This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at through the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. Should the conclusion or finding is for instance no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mould the relief to really make it suitable to the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-enjoy the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Information on accessing opinions and case-related documents for that Supreme Court in the United States is available around the court’s website.
R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as the police officials did not inform him that the identification parade in the accused has not been conducted but. In the instant case, now the accused tried to take advantage of This system aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image on the petitioner was broadly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity on the accused through electronic media. The law lends assurance into the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for your witness to determine the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer put a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and generated pics. Aside from, the images shown around the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity right up until he was put up for an identification parade. Making images in the accused publically, both by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or plan, would create doubt while in the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there is no possibility for your witness to begin to see read more the accused before going into the identification parade. The accused should not be shown to your witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(two), Cr.P.C.
The different roles of case regulation in civil and common law traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale at the rear of their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and often interpret the broader legal principles.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
This guide provides beneficial insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.
nine. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars since arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is not any more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him powering the bars before conclusion of trial will serve no valuable purpose.
How much sway case law holds could vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances with the current case. To investigate this concept, think about the following case regulation definition.
Regardless of its popularity, hardly any may well be familiar with its intricacies. This article is definitely an attempt to highlight the flaws of this section as well as the really reduced threshold that governs it.
13309-B of 2010 to be weak types of evidence as well as evidentiary value whereof would be viewed within the time of the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, So, confirmed custody of your petitioner in jail is unlikely to serve any helpful purpose at this stage.”
115 . Const. P. 6025/2024 (D.B.) Dr. Pritam Das V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi As far as the stance in the respondents that pensionary benefits may very well be withheld on account of the allegations leveled against the petitioner, in our view, section twenty of the Sindh Civil Servants Act of 1973 deals with the pension and gratuity that civil servants are entitled to. However, the act does offer for certain circumstances under which a civil servant's pension can be withheld or reduced. These include if a civil servant is found guilty of misconduct or negligence during their service, their pension can be withheld or reduced. If a civil servant is convicted of a serious crime, their pension could be withheld or reduced. In a few cases, a civil servant's pension could possibly be withheld or reduced if he/she fails to comply with certain conditions established from the government.